G Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Autodesk has a net margin of 10.77% compared to Genpact's net margin of 9.31%. Genpact's return on equity of 22.22% beat Autodesk's return on equity of 40.52%.

Genpact has a consensus price target of $51.63, signalling upside risk potential of 16.98%. On the other hand Autodesk has an analysts' consensus of $336.88 which suggests that it could grow by 12.58%. Given that Genpact has higher upside potential than Autodesk, analysts believe Genpact is more attractive than Autodesk.

Genpact has a beta of 1.019, which suggesting that the stock is 1.932% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Autodesk has a beta of 1.468, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 46.828%.

Genpact has a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.42%. Autodesk offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Genpact pays 21.12% of its earnings as a dividend. Autodesk pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Genpact's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Genpact quarterly revenues are $1.2B, which are smaller than Autodesk quarterly revenues of $1.6B. Genpact's net income of $130.9M is lower than Autodesk's net income of $152M. Notably, Genpact's price-to-earnings ratio is 15.06x while Autodesk's PE ratio is 64.07x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Genpact is 1.63x versus 10.22x for Autodesk. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Alpha & Omega Semiconductor has a net margin of 10.77% compared to Genpact's net margin of -6.56%. Genpact's return on equity of 22.22% beat Alpha & Omega Semiconductor's return on equity of -2.54%.

Genpact has a consensus price target of $51.63, signalling upside risk potential of 16.98%. On the other hand Alpha & Omega Semiconductor has an analysts' consensus of $26.67 which suggests that it could grow by 23.86%. Given that Alpha & Omega Semiconductor has higher upside potential than Genpact, analysts believe Alpha & Omega Semiconductor is more attractive than Genpact.

Genpact has a beta of 1.019, which suggesting that the stock is 1.932% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Alpha & Omega Semiconductor has a beta of 2.020, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 101.972%.

Genpact has a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.42%. Alpha & Omega Semiconductor offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Genpact pays 21.12% of its earnings as a dividend. Alpha & Omega Semiconductor pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Genpact's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Genpact quarterly revenues are $1.2B, which are larger than Alpha & Omega Semiconductor quarterly revenues of $164.6M. Genpact's net income of $130.9M is higher than Alpha & Omega Semiconductor's net income of -$10.8M. Notably, Genpact's price-to-earnings ratio is 15.06x while Alpha & Omega Semiconductor's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Genpact is 1.63x versus 0.92x for Alpha & Omega Semiconductor. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

CommVault Systems has a net margin of 10.77% compared to Genpact's net margin of 11.27%. Genpact's return on equity of 22.22% beat CommVault Systems's return on equity of 26.23%.

Genpact has a consensus price target of $51.63, signalling upside risk potential of 16.98%. On the other hand CommVault Systems has an analysts' consensus of $181.90 which suggests that it could grow by 2.89%. Given that Genpact has higher upside potential than CommVault Systems, analysts believe Genpact is more attractive than CommVault Systems.

Genpact has a beta of 1.019, which suggesting that the stock is 1.932% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CommVault Systems has a beta of 0.712, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 28.773%.

Genpact has a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.42%. CommVault Systems offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Genpact pays 21.12% of its earnings as a dividend. CommVault Systems pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Genpact's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Genpact quarterly revenues are $1.2B, which are larger than CommVault Systems quarterly revenues of $275M. Genpact's net income of $130.9M is higher than CommVault Systems's net income of $31M. Notably, Genpact's price-to-earnings ratio is 15.06x while CommVault Systems's PE ratio is 104.62x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Genpact is 1.63x versus 8.01x for CommVault Systems. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

TaskUs has a net margin of 10.77% compared to Genpact's net margin of 7.61%. Genpact's return on equity of 22.22% beat TaskUs's return on equity of 11.42%.

Genpact has a consensus price target of $51.63, signalling upside risk potential of 16.98%. On the other hand TaskUs has an analysts' consensus of $17.75 which suggests that it could grow by 7.25%. Given that Genpact has higher upside potential than TaskUs, analysts believe Genpact is more attractive than TaskUs.

Genpact has a beta of 1.019, which suggesting that the stock is 1.932% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison TaskUs has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Genpact has a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.42%. TaskUs offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Genpact pays 21.12% of its earnings as a dividend. TaskUs pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Genpact's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Genpact quarterly revenues are $1.2B, which are larger than TaskUs quarterly revenues of $277.8M. Genpact's net income of $130.9M is higher than TaskUs's net income of $21.1M. Notably, Genpact's price-to-earnings ratio is 15.06x while TaskUs's PE ratio is 27.13x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Genpact is 1.63x versus 1.47x for TaskUs. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.